Even as the attack began Abu Rahma says he knew what it was about.

Three weeks ago, on New Year's eve, he published a scathing article on a Palestinian news website titled "The Gap Between Resistance and Governance." In it he took Palestinian political factions to task for their lack of tolerance, rampant corruption, and liberal use of torture and arrests to harass those who criticize them.

"Power and authority with a poor moral foundation are doomed to fail. They will destroy themselves and lead their people to corruption and injustice," Abu Rahma wrote in the essay.

"The people of any nation have a responsibility to criticize those who lead them. We must look in the mirror before we can see ourselves clearly. "

Mahmoud Abu Rahma

Abu Rahma also criticized armed militant groups for endangering the lives of civilians.

The unsparing critique on the powers-that-be in the West Bank and Gaza brought an immediate reaction.

Abu Rahma says he was quickly subjected to a series of threatening email and phone calls and three days after publication a group of masked men entered his building and beat him up.

During the course of the second attack Abu Rahma was able to escape his assailants and get home where family and friends got him medical attention.

The Hamas-controlled Information Ministry in Gaza said in a statement the government was investigating the circumstances of the attack on Abu Rahma and called it a violation of human rights. It also said Gaza authorities respected the right of political expression as long as it conformed with "national responsibility."

But international rights organizations like Human Rights Watch say the governments in both Gaza and the West Bank are complicit in the abuse and harassment of Palestinian critics using both detention and torture as a means of repression.

"Hamas's failure to protect Abu Rahma, who has been a leading voice for human rights in Gaza, sends a chilling message to other human rights defenders," says Human Rights Watch's Middle East director Sarah Leah Whitson.

"Hamas needs to investigate the attacks against him promptly and thoroughly and to appropriately punish those found responsible."

Speaking on the phone from Gaza, Abu Rahma says he does not know who is behind the "cowardly attack" but says the attempt to silence those looking to improve Palestinian society will not work.

He remains unbowed and said the tremendous outpouring of support following his article and subsequent attacks has only stiffened his resolve.

"I am confident that the Palestinian people will stand together for human rights and self freedom of expression"

He was the first Arab leader to call for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down, yet after months of violence and a less than successful effort by the Arab League to stop the killing of protesters, King Abdullah of Jordan says don't expect change in Syria overnight.

"I don't see Syria going through many changes. I think what you're seeing in Syria today, you will continue to see for a while longer," Abdullah said in an interview with CNN's Security Clearance blog.

"It's a very complicated puzzle and there is no simple solution. If you can imagine Iraq being a simple solution to move Iraq into the light a couple of years ago and it's different in Libya, so it has everybody stumped and I don't think anybody has a clear answer on what to do about Syria."

Read the whole story here.

This week a court in the West Bank City of Ramallah overturned a government ban on the broadcast of a highly popular Palestinian satirical television show called "Watan Ala Watar".

Described as a Palestinian version of the American show, "Saturday Night Live", "Watan Ala Watar" or "Nation on the Edge" served up a weekly offering of cutting political and social satire which spared no one in Palestinian society and angered more than a few in the Palestinian Authority.

Sketches on the shows routinely featured parodies of Palestinian political factions including Fatah and Hamas and offered send-ups of sensitive cultural issues like the enforcement of veils for women in Gaza.

Speaking to CNN about the show in 2009, writer and actor Imad Farajin said that when it came to subject matter there were no sacred cows.

"We talk about Abu Mazen, the Palestinian president, and for Arab people to talk about their president through comedy show is not easy, but we did it and I am proud of it," Farajin remarked

The program was pulled off the Palestinian Authority controlled television station in August during the heavy viewing period of Ramadan after a number of Palestinian officials complained that the show unfairly misrepresented them and did damage to their reputations.

Speaking to CNN on Friday Farajin said that some Palestinian officials went as far as to sue the makers of the program.

"We received law suits and complaints from the head of the anti-corruption commission to the head of the police director force," he said.

Farajin said he and the other cast and crew of the show were pleased with the court's decision calling it "a victory for freedom of speech and for the Palestinian arts and culture in general," but he expressed regret that the show was able to be taken off the air in the first place.

"It's not the authority of the attorney general to take us off air, we are the only comedy show in Palestine. We have not been able to work since August of 2011 which a lot of the crew was financially effected."

While the court ruling allows the show to go back on air, it's not clear that the Palestinian Authority-run Palestine TV network will put the program back on the schedule.

Speaking to Agence France Press, Palestine TV's director of programming Imad Asfar said the network was working on developing other shows to replace Watan Ala Watar.

Despite this, Farajin remains unbowed and committed to the show.

"It's my right as a Palestinian citizen and priority for us to go back on Palestinian airwaves, but no one from Palestine TV has approached us to go back."

He says that will not prevent Watan Ala Watar from returning even if it means finding a new home for the program.

"We are negotiating with other Arab networks in the region," he said.

Stay tuned.

As Israelis and Palestinians attempted to give peace a chance this past week with a second Jordanian sponsored meeting of the two sides, a new report issued by an Israeli settlement watch dog organization is likely to further dim the unlikely prospect of any breakthrough between the parties.

Tuesday, the anti-settlement activist group Peace Now released a new report citing a 20% increase in the construction of Israeli settlements in the West Bank in 2011. The report found that the number of plans for new Jewish homes in predominantly Arab East Jerusalem was at its highest number in a decade with over 3,600 housing units approved and preliminary plans made for another 2660.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Peace Now director, Yariv Oppenheimer, said, 2011 "will be remembered as the 'year of the settlers' regarding construction in the West Bank" and claimed the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was jeopardizing the possibility of a two-state solution.

The Israeli government described Peace Now’s figures as exaggerated and spokesman Mark Regev offered this pointed retort:

"The current Israeli government has been attacked by the leadership of the settlement movement for being the "worst government in Israel's history" when it comes to settlement construction. And it is indeed true that we have shown more restraint on the issue of settlement than any previous Israeli government. We initiated the unprecedented ten-month settlement moratorium and even since the conclusion of that moratorium we continue to exercise great restraint."

The highly contentious issue of Israeli construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem - land the Palestinians seek for a future state - is one of the main sticking points preventing the full-scale resumption of negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has declared repeatedly a peace deal with Israel will not be possible without a complete freeze on settlement building. The Israeli government maintains that Palestinians are merely using the settlement issue as an excuse not to engage in serious bilateral negotiations and that Palestinians seek instead to pursue unilateral action through international bodies like the United Nations.

Excuse or not, it would appear that few are holding out hope that the most current round of meetings between the two sides will lead anywhere.

Speaking to Middle East envoy Tony Blair Tuesday, veteran Palestinian politician and PLO executive committee member Hanan Ashrawi said, "Negotiations are just a means to an end. With the great disproportionateness in power between Palestine and Israel, Palestinians are still asked to negotiate with the occupying power to get permission from Israel to achieve freedom. Israeli policies are based on the theft of Palestinian land, resources and money. Unless Israel refrains from all illegal settlement activities and commits to 1967 borders, the Palestinian people will not return to negotiations."

Direct talks stalled in 2010 because of the settlement issue - and It would appear, for now at least, that 2012 is not likely to be remembered as the year of a negotiated peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

A newly discovered 2000-year-old coin-sized clay seal is shedding light on one of the most significant periods of Jewish history, Israeli archaeologists announced Sunday.

The seal was found in an ongoing archaeological excavation taking place along Jerusalem’s Western Wall and carries an Aramaic inscription, which researchers say translated as “Pure for God.”

The find dates back from between the 1st century B.C. to 70 A.D, the period in which the second of two Jewish temples was destroyed by the Romans during the course of a Jewish revolt.

In a statement, the Israeli Antiquities Authority, which oversees archaeological excavations in the area, said it represented a first-of-its-kind discovery and constitutes “direct archaeological evidence of the activity on the Temple Mount and the workings of the Temple during the Second Temple period.”

Haifa University archaeologist Ronny Reich, who has spent four decades digging around the Old City of Jerusalem, said the seal revealed details about some of the administrative procedures used by temple officials to oversee religious offerings.

"If you wanted to give a drink offering to the temple you went and bought an impressed seal from one person, a priest obviously, and then gave him the money,” Reich explained. “You went to the other man and received against this coupon lets call it a drink offering. And then went to the temple to offer it.”

The excavation is taking place beneath the religious compound know as the Temple Mount to Jews and the Noble Sanctuary to Muslims. The site is revered by both religions and previous archaeological activities in the area have sparked violent confrontations between Israeli and Palestinians.

At the press conference to announce the find, archaeologists were flanked by two government ministers from the right-wing Likud party who used the discovery to press Jewish claims of sovereignty over Jerusalem.

“The works of the digs are uncovering our roots,” said Education Minister Gideon Saar. “They could not be carried out if Israel was not the sovereign in control of Jerusalem and emphasized the work in this area.”

The international community does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over East Jerusalem, where the excavation is located, and Palestinians consider the eastern part of the city as the capital of their future state.

From website of local UAE show Emirates 24/7

Ahead of the United Arab Emirates' 40th National Day on December 2nd, international sportswear brand Puma have launched a pair of limited edition trainers in the colours of the UAE flag, which have sparked anger across a wide section of Emaratis and Arabs living in the UAE – who see the flag colours on footwear as an insult to a nation.

Abdullah K, an Emarati professional, told this website, “Puma should have borne in mind the cultural sensitivities of the people of the UAE. The flag is a very sacred symbol for the UAE. It cannot be trivialised, especially not as footwear.”

Ahmed S, an Emirati businessman adds that while in some countries the flag can be draped in any manner as any accessory, this will never be acceptable in the UAE. “You cannot wear your nation’s flag on your feet. That is just disrespectful,” he said.

Ramzi Khalaf, an Arab expatriate working in advertising and marketing, said he was dissapointed that a big international brand like Puma had gotten it seemingly wrong.

"Big brands have to realise that you cannot have one idea for the whole world. Each area you operate in has to have tailor-made solutions. Especially here in the Middle East, where cultural senstivities are key, you have to be very careful."

At the time of filing this report, several complaints were coming in to this website about the Puma shoes, as anger seemed to be widespread.

Puma was yet to release a statement to the press.

After years of delays, hundreds of millions of dollars in cost overruns and stiff political opposition, Jerusalem's ultra-modern light rail project was finally launched this past Friday in what transportation officials are calling "a dream come true".

Originally planned to embark on its debut journey in 2006, Jerusalem's grandiose light rail trains finally opened their doors for thousands of passengers anxious to experience the electric wonder.

"This is a new era for the public system", says Nadav Meroz of the Jerusalem Transportation Masterplan, a body established by city officials in an effort to put an end to major traffic backups across the dense city.

But with costs that escalated like a runaway train to an astounding price tag of $1.2 billion dollars– almost double the original estimate– not all are certain that this was money well spent. "The train has transformed from a mean's to an end to a goal of its own (one) that justifies all means and crushes everything on its way in order to produce fat profits to its planners", residents of one of the impacted neighbourhoods complained in a letter sent to local newspapers.

But transportation officials say otherwise. "This system is going to give service to the people of Jerusalem for decades now. So I believe it is worth it, of course", Meroz tells CNN.

Stretching from Mount Herzl in the south of Jerusalem all the way into the city's northern neighbourhoods, through the city center, and the old city, the rail also passes through the Palestinian east Jerusalem neighbourhoods of Shuafat and Beit Hanina. Construction provoked repeated allegations by Palestinians that the train was Israel's way of taking over their land. Israel captured east Jerusalem during the 1967 Six Day War and the Palestinians see it as their future capital.

"The aim of the project is to connect the settlements with west Jerusalem" says Ahmed al-Rueidi, head of the unit for Jerusalem affairs at the Palestinian Authority's  presidential office. "They are using our land, Palestinian land. The train is illegal and so are the settlements".

Meroz dismisses the claims. "Go there yourself and ask the people who live there, ask the people who have shops over there. People want to live by the rail, want to open shops there. Everything went up. Without any difference whether you are Jewish, Arabic or Christian, it doesn't matter, it is a project for everyone."

Having completely changed the face of Jerusalem's city center and its formerly buzzing and lively Jaffa Street during construction, planners were forced to defend accusations of  irreparable economic damage to merchants who said they were forced to close shops and restaurants. Some said construction work along the track scared off customers, finding merchants and city residents alike on the wrong side of the tracks.

Chairman of the city traders committee Eli Levi says hundreds of small businesses have closed down and 1,500 workers lost their jobs due to long delays in infrastructure and interruption to street life. "The works were planned without any consideration in businesses and residents that used to shop in the city center." Levi's committee estimates direct damages to merchants at nearly $500 million.

But rail executives believe now that the proverbial train has left the station that even critics will come to appreciate the project despite the years of acrimony.

"We brought the street back to the people of Jerusalem. I believe that this will change dramatically the way people think about the city center," says Nadav Meroz.

Acknowledging the decline of some property prices along the track during construction, Meroz confidently predicts the opening of the line will drive shop owners' revenues up "dramatically."

For the first few weeks of operation train rides are being offered free of charge. The rail is ultimately expected to cater to over 100,000 passengers a day.

“We will liberate London, house (by) house, room (by) room, street (by) street, corner (by) corner, until we liberate London from the bad boys and the rats.”

While the bombastic diction may sound familiar, these are not the words of Libyan President Moammar Gadaffi who earlier this year proclaimed he wanted to “cleanse Libya house by house.” Instead, it is a somewhat sarcastic post by a Facebook user who calls himself "Syrian Prince."

He is part of a section of the Arab blogosphere satirizing the scenes of looting and mayhem coming out of the UK during this week's riots.

Some have tried to compare the violence in London and other UK cities with the discontent that sparked the Arab Spring, a number of parody Facebook pages have quickly sprung up to witheringly dismiss this analogy.

“Mr. Bean tell BBC, we are against any form (of) disorder, and I tell the whole world, we are all equal, and will stay with the queen (sic) forever,” reads a post written by the admin of the group on the “Britain is our country, and Elizabeth is our Queen” page.

Another poster on the "God, Britain, Freedom, and that is it" site identifying themselves with a picture of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, meanwhile writes: “Damascus viewed with concern the events taking place in London and calls on the British government to avoid violence against peaceful Almtazahrien and meet their legitimate demands and acts of reason and logic in dealing with the sons of the British people, eager for freedom.”

The posts seem to mock not only comparisons to the Arab protests but also the response of Arab leaders to the entire affair. Libya’s Prime Minister, al-Baghdadi Ali al-Mahmudi has claimed that the riots showed his UK counterpart David Cameron had “lost legitimacy” while Syria’s ambassador to the UK accused Cameron of “arrogance” and “hypocrisy” for calling UK rioters criminals but not extending the same language to those on the streets of Syria.

But while some posts use satire to what they see as political maneuvering, others poke fun at the archaic nature of British society and in particular the Royal Family. “William you are not one of us, take Harry and go away from here,” reads one entry while another states “the people want to topple the Queen.”

This week, Israel's Defense Ministry agreed to make an extraordinary payment – an award of almost $150,000 to a Palestinian family in Gaza.

It is the first pay-out to any party claiming harm during the course of Operation Cast Lead – Israel's three-week offensive in Gaza that began at the end of 2008, according to the Ministry and human rights organizations

The settlement was negotiated by the Gaza-based Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) on behalf of the family of a mother and daughter killed by Israeli soldiers during Cast Lead. The payment is to be made to the family in return for their dropping the claim against the Israeli military.

The family of Riyeh and Majda Abu Hajjaj filed their claim against the Israeli military two years ago – with the help of the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem The family claimed that on January 4th, 2009 the mother and daughter were shot and killed by Israeli soldiers as they and other civilians evacuated a house in a Gaza city neighbourhood while carrying white flags. The family said they were not able to retrieve the bodies from the scene until two weeks later because of continued fighting in the area.

In a statement to CNN the Israeli Ministry of Defense said the claim was settled out of court "because the Defense Ministry believes that it was exceptional (not reflecting at all on the norm) and justifies the granting of reparation."

The Israeli military said after the complaint was filed by the family military police opened an investigation, but that as of yet no indictment against any Israeli soldiers has been filed in the case. In a separate statement to CNN on the case the Israeli military said:

"Following this complaint a military police investigation was opened. Subsequently the Military prosecutor received information about the killing of a woman during the operation, and following on from this information another investigation was opened. The indictment letter which was presented does not relate to the incident in which the two girls from the Hajjaj family were killed, because there is doubt as to whether the shooting incident and the incident in which the two were killed is the same incident."

PCHR called the award a "judicial precedent" and said it was pursuing "hundreds of claims" on behalf of alleged Palestinian victims of Israel's military operation.

Israel launched Operation Cast Lead in late December 2008 to stop Hamas and other militant groups from firing rockets into the southern parts of the country. Conflicting death tolls from the operation have fueled debate and controversy.

More than 1,400 Palestinians died in Israel's incursion, according to officials in Gaza. The Israeli military has maintained 1,166 people were killed, 60 percent of whom were "terror operatives."

Sarit Michaeli, the spokeswoman for B'Tselem said reparation payments to Palestinians injured or killed in Israeli military operations were "pretty rare," citing various legal and bureaucratic hurdles plaintiffs must clear and speculated that the fact that the military settled was a reflection of the "blatant" and "exceptional" nature of the case.